Quiz-summary
0 of 9 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
Information
Premium Practice Questions
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 9 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 9
1. Question
In your capacity as client onboarding lead at an insurer, you are handling Understanding Weld Size and Location Symbols during sanctions screening. A colleague forwards you a whistleblower report showing that a primary contractor for a subsea pipeline project has been misidentifying intermittent fillet weld requirements on their fabrication blueprints. The report suggests that the contractor is confusing the sequence of dimensions placed to the right of the weld symbol, potentially leading to insufficient structural spacing. When reviewing these technical specifications for risk assessment, how should the two numbers located to the right of a fillet weld symbol be interpreted according to standard welding symbol conventions?
Correct
Correct: In standard welding symbols (AWS A2.4), for intermittent welds, the dimensions for the length of the weld increments and the pitch (center-to-center spacing) are placed to the right of the weld symbol. The length of the weld segment is always listed first, followed by the pitch, usually separated by a hyphen.
Incorrect: Reversing the order of length and pitch is a common misinterpretation that can lead to incorrect spacing and structural weakness. The weld leg size is placed to the left of the weld symbol, not the right. The effective throat thickness is also typically placed to the left of the symbol or in parentheses, and the total length of a joint is not typically the second number in an intermittent weld sequence.
Takeaway: On a welding symbol for intermittent welds, the length of the weld segment always precedes the pitch on the right side of the reference line.
Incorrect
Correct: In standard welding symbols (AWS A2.4), for intermittent welds, the dimensions for the length of the weld increments and the pitch (center-to-center spacing) are placed to the right of the weld symbol. The length of the weld segment is always listed first, followed by the pitch, usually separated by a hyphen.
Incorrect: Reversing the order of length and pitch is a common misinterpretation that can lead to incorrect spacing and structural weakness. The weld leg size is placed to the left of the weld symbol, not the right. The effective throat thickness is also typically placed to the left of the symbol or in parentheses, and the total length of a joint is not typically the second number in an intermittent weld sequence.
Takeaway: On a welding symbol for intermittent welds, the length of the weld segment always precedes the pitch on the right side of the reference line.
-
Question 2 of 9
2. Question
Which consideration is most important when selecting an approach to Pipe Material Science? When welding high-strength low-alloy (HSLA) steel piping for high-pressure steam service, a welder must account for the material’s susceptibility to hydrogen-induced cracking and the formation of brittle microstructures. Given the specific chemical composition and the thickness of the pipe wall, which factor is most critical for maintaining the structural integrity of the joint?
Correct
Correct: Evaluating the Carbon Equivalent (CE) is vital because it provides a numerical value representing the weldability of the steel based on its chemical composition. For HSLA and alloy steels, the CE dictates the preheat and interpass temperatures required to slow the cooling rate. This controlled cooling prevents the formation of martensite, a hard and brittle phase, and allows hydrogen to diffuse out of the weld metal, thereby mitigating the risk of cold cracking.
Incorrect: Increasing travel speed to minimize heat input is often counterproductive in alloy steels because it can lead to faster cooling rates, which increases the risk of forming brittle microstructures. Selecting a filler metal with significantly higher tensile strength than the base metal can create excessive residual stress and increase the likelihood of cracking in the HAZ. Utilizing a purely inert shielding gas is not a universal solution; the choice of shielding gas must be compatible with the specific welding process and does not address the fundamental metallurgical changes caused by the thermal cycle.
Takeaway: Understanding the relationship between chemical composition and cooling rates is essential for preventing brittle transformations and hydrogen-induced cracking in alloy pipe welding.
Incorrect
Correct: Evaluating the Carbon Equivalent (CE) is vital because it provides a numerical value representing the weldability of the steel based on its chemical composition. For HSLA and alloy steels, the CE dictates the preheat and interpass temperatures required to slow the cooling rate. This controlled cooling prevents the formation of martensite, a hard and brittle phase, and allows hydrogen to diffuse out of the weld metal, thereby mitigating the risk of cold cracking.
Incorrect: Increasing travel speed to minimize heat input is often counterproductive in alloy steels because it can lead to faster cooling rates, which increases the risk of forming brittle microstructures. Selecting a filler metal with significantly higher tensile strength than the base metal can create excessive residual stress and increase the likelihood of cracking in the HAZ. Utilizing a purely inert shielding gas is not a universal solution; the choice of shielding gas must be compatible with the specific welding process and does not address the fundamental metallurgical changes caused by the thermal cycle.
Takeaway: Understanding the relationship between chemical composition and cooling rates is essential for preventing brittle transformations and hydrogen-induced cracking in alloy pipe welding.
-
Question 3 of 9
3. Question
The risk manager at a listed company is tasked with addressing Understanding NDT Acceptance Criteria during conflicts of interest. After reviewing an internal audit finding from the Q3 infrastructure project, the key concern is that the lead welding inspector, who also serves as a consultant for the primary pipe supplier, has been applying subjective interpretations to radiographic testing (RT) results. Specifically, the inspector has been classifying rounded indications as porosity within acceptable limits, despite the project’s specific code requirements for high-pressure steam lines. Which of the following represents the most appropriate internal audit response to ensure the integrity of the NDT acceptance process?
Correct
Correct: When a conflict of interest is identified and there is evidence of subjective interpretation of Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) results, the most effective control is to introduce independent, third-party verification. This ensures that the acceptance or rejection of welds is based strictly on the technical requirements of the applicable code (such as ASME B31.3) rather than the personal or financial interests of the inspector.
Incorrect: Relying on the inspector’s judgment is inappropriate when a conflict of interest has already been identified as a risk to the project’s integrity. Increasing visual inspections is ineffective because visual testing cannot detect internal defects like porosity that are only visible through radiography. Updating the Welding Procedure Specification to match non-compliant work is a violation of engineering standards and safety protocols, as the WPS defines the parameters for a sound weld, not the acceptance criteria for defects.
Takeaway: Independent third-party verification is the essential control for mitigating bias in NDT interpretation when technical acceptance criteria are subject to potential conflicts of interest.
Incorrect
Correct: When a conflict of interest is identified and there is evidence of subjective interpretation of Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) results, the most effective control is to introduce independent, third-party verification. This ensures that the acceptance or rejection of welds is based strictly on the technical requirements of the applicable code (such as ASME B31.3) rather than the personal or financial interests of the inspector.
Incorrect: Relying on the inspector’s judgment is inappropriate when a conflict of interest has already been identified as a risk to the project’s integrity. Increasing visual inspections is ineffective because visual testing cannot detect internal defects like porosity that are only visible through radiography. Updating the Welding Procedure Specification to match non-compliant work is a violation of engineering standards and safety protocols, as the WPS defines the parameters for a sound weld, not the acceptance criteria for defects.
Takeaway: Independent third-party verification is the essential control for mitigating bias in NDT interpretation when technical acceptance criteria are subject to potential conflicts of interest.
-
Question 4 of 9
4. Question
As the information security manager at a fintech lender, you are reviewing Visual Inspection Techniques during market conduct when a transaction monitoring alert arrives on your desk. It reveals that a contractor performing 5G and 6G welds on a high-pressure steam line has documented a ‘low spot’ on the final cap pass of a carbon steel joint. The visual inspection report indicates that the weld metal is consistently below the plane of the base metal surface across the width of the groove, although no sharp grooves are present at the toes. Which condition does this describe, and what is the standard visual inspection protocol for this finding?
Correct
Correct: Underfill is a condition where the weld face or root surface is below the adjacent surface of the base metal. In the context of a cap pass, it indicates that the groove was not filled to the level of the pipe surface. The primary visual inspection criteria involve ensuring that the remaining thickness of the weld and pipe meets the minimum design requirements specified in the Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) or applicable code (such as ASME Section IX or AWS D1.1).
Incorrect: Undercut is specifically a groove melted into the base metal adjacent to the toe or root of the weld, not a general lack of filler metal across the entire face. Excessive reinforcement refers to weld metal that is higher than the base metal surface, which is the opposite of the described condition. Slag inclusions are solid non-metallic materials trapped in the weld metal or between the weld and base metal, which is a volumetric or surface defect rather than a profile deficiency like underfill.
Takeaway: Underfill is a profile deficiency where the weld metal is insufficient to reach the base metal surface, requiring verification that the joint still meets minimum wall thickness requirements.
Incorrect
Correct: Underfill is a condition where the weld face or root surface is below the adjacent surface of the base metal. In the context of a cap pass, it indicates that the groove was not filled to the level of the pipe surface. The primary visual inspection criteria involve ensuring that the remaining thickness of the weld and pipe meets the minimum design requirements specified in the Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) or applicable code (such as ASME Section IX or AWS D1.1).
Incorrect: Undercut is specifically a groove melted into the base metal adjacent to the toe or root of the weld, not a general lack of filler metal across the entire face. Excessive reinforcement refers to weld metal that is higher than the base metal surface, which is the opposite of the described condition. Slag inclusions are solid non-metallic materials trapped in the weld metal or between the weld and base metal, which is a volumetric or surface defect rather than a profile deficiency like underfill.
Takeaway: Underfill is a profile deficiency where the weld metal is insufficient to reach the base metal surface, requiring verification that the joint still meets minimum wall thickness requirements.
-
Question 5 of 9
5. Question
Following an alert related to Following WPS Requirements, what is the proper response? A welder working on a high-pressure alloy steel pipe observes that the interpass temperature has exceeded the maximum limit specified in the Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) during the third fill pass. The project schedule is tight, and the joint is nearly complete.
Correct
Correct: The Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) is a qualified document that defines the limits for essential and supplemental essential variables. Interpass temperature is critical in alloy steels to prevent grain growth and maintain the required mechanical properties of the heat-affected zone (HAZ). If the maximum interpass temperature is exceeded, the welder must stop and allow the material to cool to the approved range to ensure the weldment remains within the qualified parameters of the Procedure Qualification Record (PQR).
Incorrect: Increasing travel speed or decreasing voltage are methods to manage heat input, but they do not correct a violation of the maximum interpass temperature once it has occurred. Changing electrode diameter is often a variable change that may not be permitted without a revised WPS. Proceeding with the weld while knowingly violating WPS parameters is a breach of quality standards; post-weld heat treatment is designed for stress relief or tempering and cannot always reverse the metallurgical damage caused by excessive interpass temperatures during the welding process.
Takeaway: Strict adherence to WPS thermal limits, such as interpass temperature, is mandatory to ensure the metallurgical integrity and mechanical performance of the welded joint.
Incorrect
Correct: The Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) is a qualified document that defines the limits for essential and supplemental essential variables. Interpass temperature is critical in alloy steels to prevent grain growth and maintain the required mechanical properties of the heat-affected zone (HAZ). If the maximum interpass temperature is exceeded, the welder must stop and allow the material to cool to the approved range to ensure the weldment remains within the qualified parameters of the Procedure Qualification Record (PQR).
Incorrect: Increasing travel speed or decreasing voltage are methods to manage heat input, but they do not correct a violation of the maximum interpass temperature once it has occurred. Changing electrode diameter is often a variable change that may not be permitted without a revised WPS. Proceeding with the weld while knowingly violating WPS parameters is a breach of quality standards; post-weld heat treatment is designed for stress relief or tempering and cannot always reverse the metallurgical damage caused by excessive interpass temperatures during the welding process.
Takeaway: Strict adherence to WPS thermal limits, such as interpass temperature, is mandatory to ensure the metallurgical integrity and mechanical performance of the welded joint.
-
Question 6 of 9
6. Question
The operations team at a wealth manager has encountered an exception involving Safety Practices in Pipe Welding during control testing. They report that during a site visit to a critical infrastructure project, an internal auditor observed a welder performing a 5G position weld on a pressurized steam line within a restricted-access service tunnel. The auditor found that the initial oxygen level check was documented at 08:00, but the welder had been working for three hours without a secondary observer or active ventilation. Which of the following represents the most critical safety protocol violation in this scenario?
Correct
Correct: In pipe welding, especially within restricted-access areas like service tunnels, the environment is classified as a confined space. Safety standards require both continuous atmospheric monitoring—because welding fumes and gas leaks can rapidly displace oxygen or create explosive atmospheres—and a dedicated safety attendant (hole watch) to facilitate emergency rescue and monitor the welder’s status.
Incorrect: While hydrostatic testing is important for pipe integrity, it is a quality control measure rather than a primary life-safety protocol for confined space entry. Localized exhaust for hexavalent chromium is specific to stainless steel welding and, while important, is secondary to the immediate risk of asphyxiation in a confined space. Using a GFCI is a standard electrical safety practice, but the lack of monitoring and an attendant in a confined space represents a more immediate and severe risk to life in this specific scenario.
Takeaway: Confined space welding operations must always include continuous atmospheric monitoring and a dedicated safety attendant to mitigate the immediate risks of asphyxiation and entrapment.
Incorrect
Correct: In pipe welding, especially within restricted-access areas like service tunnels, the environment is classified as a confined space. Safety standards require both continuous atmospheric monitoring—because welding fumes and gas leaks can rapidly displace oxygen or create explosive atmospheres—and a dedicated safety attendant (hole watch) to facilitate emergency rescue and monitor the welder’s status.
Incorrect: While hydrostatic testing is important for pipe integrity, it is a quality control measure rather than a primary life-safety protocol for confined space entry. Localized exhaust for hexavalent chromium is specific to stainless steel welding and, while important, is secondary to the immediate risk of asphyxiation in a confined space. Using a GFCI is a standard electrical safety practice, but the lack of monitoring and an attendant in a confined space represents a more immediate and severe risk to life in this specific scenario.
Takeaway: Confined space welding operations must always include continuous atmospheric monitoring and a dedicated safety attendant to mitigate the immediate risks of asphyxiation and entrapment.
-
Question 7 of 9
7. Question
Two proposed approaches to Following WPS Requirements conflict. Which approach is more appropriate, and why? A welder working on a high-pressure alloy steel pipeline finds that the specified interpass temperature range in the Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) is difficult to maintain due to the thickness of the pipe and the ambient environmental conditions. One approach suggests that the welder should slightly exceed the maximum interpass temperature to maintain productivity and prevent potential cold cracking in the root, while the second approach suggests strictly adhering to the interpass temperature limits even if it requires frequent pauses and cooling periods.
Correct
Correct: The WPS is a qualified document based on a Procedure Qualification Record (PQR). For alloy steels, the maximum interpass temperature is a critical variable because exceeding it can lead to excessive grain growth, a reduction in notch toughness, and potentially a loss of corrosion resistance or tensile strength. Strict adherence ensures the final weldment matches the mechanical properties verified during the qualification process.
Incorrect: Exceeding the interpass temperature to prevent cracking is incorrect because while heat helps, exceeding the qualified limit risks metallurgical degradation. Adhering to limits only for specific passes is incorrect because the WPS governs the entire welding operation to ensure uniform properties. Compensating with travel speed is incorrect because interpass temperature and travel speed are independent variables; exceeding a thermal limit cannot be ‘offset’ by changing other parameters without a new procedure qualification.
Takeaway: Strict adherence to all WPS parameters, particularly thermal limits like interpass temperature, is mandatory to ensure the metallurgical integrity and mechanical properties of the completed weld.
Incorrect
Correct: The WPS is a qualified document based on a Procedure Qualification Record (PQR). For alloy steels, the maximum interpass temperature is a critical variable because exceeding it can lead to excessive grain growth, a reduction in notch toughness, and potentially a loss of corrosion resistance or tensile strength. Strict adherence ensures the final weldment matches the mechanical properties verified during the qualification process.
Incorrect: Exceeding the interpass temperature to prevent cracking is incorrect because while heat helps, exceeding the qualified limit risks metallurgical degradation. Adhering to limits only for specific passes is incorrect because the WPS governs the entire welding operation to ensure uniform properties. Compensating with travel speed is incorrect because interpass temperature and travel speed are independent variables; exceeding a thermal limit cannot be ‘offset’ by changing other parameters without a new procedure qualification.
Takeaway: Strict adherence to all WPS parameters, particularly thermal limits like interpass temperature, is mandatory to ensure the metallurgical integrity and mechanical properties of the completed weld.
-
Question 8 of 9
8. Question
A gap analysis conducted at a broker-dealer regarding Welding Machine Operation and Maintenance as part of model risk concluded that the preventative maintenance program for the shop’s SMAW and GTAW power sources was failing to address the degradation of internal components. Over a six-month period, technicians reported an increase in arc wandering and erratic voltage readings while performing 5G and 6G position welds on alloy steel piping. The Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) requires strict adherence to voltage ranges to ensure proper penetration and heat input. Which step should be taken to restore machine performance and ensure compliance with the qualified welding procedures?
Correct
Correct: Accumulated dust and debris inside a welding power source can cause overheating and electrical leakage, leading to arc instability and erratic voltage. Cleaning the unit with low-pressure air and ensuring all electrical connections are tight and corrosion-free are fundamental maintenance steps that restore the machine’s ability to deliver the stable output required by the WPS.
Incorrect: Overriding factory calibration is dangerous and can lead to equipment failure or inaccurate meter readings. Magnetic grounds are often a source of arc blow in DC welding, which would likely increase arc wandering rather than solve it. Modifying a WPS to compensate for poorly maintained equipment is a violation of quality control standards and does not address the underlying mechanical or electrical risk.
Takeaway: Routine internal cleaning and electrical connection audits are essential to maintain the arc stability and voltage accuracy required for high-code pipe welding applications.
Incorrect
Correct: Accumulated dust and debris inside a welding power source can cause overheating and electrical leakage, leading to arc instability and erratic voltage. Cleaning the unit with low-pressure air and ensuring all electrical connections are tight and corrosion-free are fundamental maintenance steps that restore the machine’s ability to deliver the stable output required by the WPS.
Incorrect: Overriding factory calibration is dangerous and can lead to equipment failure or inaccurate meter readings. Magnetic grounds are often a source of arc blow in DC welding, which would likely increase arc wandering rather than solve it. Modifying a WPS to compensate for poorly maintained equipment is a violation of quality control standards and does not address the underlying mechanical or electrical risk.
Takeaway: Routine internal cleaning and electrical connection audits are essential to maintain the arc stability and voltage accuracy required for high-code pipe welding applications.
-
Question 9 of 9
9. Question
A new business initiative at a mid-sized retail bank requires guidance on Fire Prevention and Control as part of transaction monitoring. The proposal raises questions about the safety oversight of a contractor performing 5G position welding on carbon steel piping within the bank’s primary data center. As part of the risk assessment for the hot work permit, the internal auditor must verify the duration of the post-welding fire watch. According to standard fire safety regulations for welding operations, what is the minimum time a dedicated fire watch must remain at the scene after the welding has been completed?
Correct
Correct: According to OSHA 1910.252 and NFPA 51B, a fire watch is required for at least 30 minutes after completion of welding or cutting operations to detect and extinguish possible smoldering fires. This is a critical control in high-risk environments like a bank’s infrastructure where delayed ignition could lead to catastrophic data loss.
Incorrect: A 15-minute duration is insufficient as smoldering can persist longer before visible flames appear. A 10-minute duration is too short regardless of the welding process or material type. A 45-minute requirement specifically for galvanized pipe is not a standard regulatory threshold; the 30-minute minimum applies generally unless a specific site risk assessment dictates a longer period.
Takeaway: A fire watch must be maintained for a minimum of 30 minutes post-welding to mitigate the risk of delayed ignition from smoldering materials.
Incorrect
Correct: According to OSHA 1910.252 and NFPA 51B, a fire watch is required for at least 30 minutes after completion of welding or cutting operations to detect and extinguish possible smoldering fires. This is a critical control in high-risk environments like a bank’s infrastructure where delayed ignition could lead to catastrophic data loss.
Incorrect: A 15-minute duration is insufficient as smoldering can persist longer before visible flames appear. A 10-minute duration is too short regardless of the welding process or material type. A 45-minute requirement specifically for galvanized pipe is not a standard regulatory threshold; the 30-minute minimum applies generally unless a specific site risk assessment dictates a longer period.
Takeaway: A fire watch must be maintained for a minimum of 30 minutes post-welding to mitigate the risk of delayed ignition from smoldering materials.